User contributions
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(latest | earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
- 09:59, 6 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Zeno's paradoxes (→Quantized spacetime, infinite sequences, and the state of this article) (top)
- 09:50, 6 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Zeno's paradoxes (→Quantized spacetime, infinite sequences, and the state of this article)
- 02:02, 4 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Zeno's paradoxes (→Quantized spacetime, infinite sequences, and the state of this article: wasn't logged in :()
- 04:07, 3 July 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Christianity (→What would be required?: new section)
- 22:33, 20 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:List of countries' copyright length (→Copyright term for corporate-made works) (top)
- 22:33, 20 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:List of countries' copyright length (→Copyright term for corporate-made works)
- 23:56, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Don't be inconsiderate (→The big problem) (top)
- 23:51, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Don't be inconsiderate (→The big problem: new section)
- 23:43, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Autobiography (→Proposed change) (top)
- 23:43, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Autobiography (→Proposed change)
- 23:41, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Autobiography (→Proposed change)
- 23:32, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Mike4ty4 (→Response) (top)
- 06:39, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Mike4ty4 (→A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review)
- 06:29, 18 June 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Carlossuarez46 (→IDONTLIKE it as good argument for deletion?: new section)
- 03:19, 8 June 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Mike4ty4 (→A note re: Talk:Rorschach test/2009 consensus review)
- 08:18, 31 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Dwarfism
- 19:57, 10 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Aqua-lung (→Trademark: new section) (top)
- 00:26, 10 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:List of countries' copyright length
- 00:21, 10 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:List of countries' copyright length (→Copyright term for corporate-made works: new section)
- 09:40, 2 May 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Bahá'u'lláh/Photo (→Photograph - Question of TASTE) (top)
- 04:02, 25 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Bronze Age (Quite a bit of "Asia" was already discussed before this section.)
- 08:54, 14 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (→Refusal to 'get the point': need not be a "rule")
- 09:58, 5 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Superocean (top)
- 00:16, 4 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Superocean (:)))
- 00:16, 4 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Superocean (:))
- 00:15, 4 April 2009 (hist) (diff) Talk:Superocean
- 02:43, 13 March 2009 (hist) (diff) General number field sieve
- 23:02, 21 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Glass (→Behavior of antique glass)
- 23:33, 18 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Tendentious editing (→Biased editing on a regular basis is not a sin)
- 23:30, 18 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Tendentious editing (→Making this into a real guideline.: new section)
- 23:06, 18 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Tendentious editing (→Characteristics of problem editors)
- 23:02, 18 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (→Refusal to 'get the point': little fixups)
- 23:00, 18 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (→Refusal to 'get the point': need not be a policy proposal that was rejected, just a point)
- 22:56, 18 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Disruptive editing (correct small typo, ps the last 2 anon edits were mine)
- 23:00, 17 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Copyrights (→License: new section)
- 22:54, 16 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Disruptive editing (→Refusal to get the point)
- 22:44, 16 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Disruptive editing (→Refusal to get the point)
- 22:43, 16 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Disruptive editing (→Refusal to get the point: new section)
- 19:30, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→Gaming)
- 19:30, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→Gaming)
- 19:25, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→The problem)
- 10:28, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→WP:REICHSTAG: new section)
- 10:24, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→Gaming)
- 10:22, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→The problem)
- 10:19, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→The problem)
- 10:17, 11 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→The problem)
- 00:01, 9 February 2009 (hist) (diff) User talk:Mike4ty4 (→WP:POINT)
- 00:00, 9 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→Gaming)
- 00:00, 9 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia talk:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (→Gaming: new section)
- 23:58, 8 February 2009 (hist) (diff) Wikipedia:Do not disrupt Wikipedia to illustrate a point (How does removing these sections turn it into more of a guideline that "merely states what not to do"?)
(latest | earliest) View (newer 50) (older 50) (20 | 50 | 100 | 250 | 500)
