Welcome to roadip.com on July 10 2009.
This is an internet experiment running to monitor browsing habbits of individuals through wikipedia contents.

Talk:Convention on Certain Conventional Weapons

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Jump to: navigation, search
WikiProject International relations / United Nations  (Rated Start-Class, Low-importance)
This article is within the scope of WikiProject International relations, an attempt to provide information in a consistent format for articles about international organizations, diplomats, international meetings, and relations between states.
If you would like to participate, you can choose to edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
Start-Class article Start  This article has been rated as Start-Class on the project's quality scale.
 Low  This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
This article is supported by WikiProject United Nations (marked as Low-importance).
Military history WikiProject     (Rated Start-Class)
MILHIST This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.

Any idea which three the US have not signed? I read in relation to the use of White phosporus as an incendiary " did not breach any protocol signed by the US" so I think Protocol III might be one.

Herne nz 09:00, 16 July 2006 (UTC)

The PDF says they signed I and II (frag weapons and land mines). Ryan4314 (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] References

I removed the 'unsigned' tag from the References section, simply because it seemed painfully redundant. After all, it sat right above two links to the treaty text, one hosted at the UN website, the other hosted at a website dedicated to the treaty (also presumably run by the UN). I do not think the tag is needed anymore; what more references could one ask for? If I forgot something, some convention of references that caused the tag to be placed there, please inform. --Ourai 15:01, 23 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] List

I notice there is not a list of the signatories, has there been any opposition to this in the past? Ryan4314 (talk) 09:48, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Constructing a table, you can help!

Hi guys, I'm constructing a list of all the signatories here, it'll have all the bells and whistles attached. The table is set up and now all that's needed is to input the data, I've added about 34 countries out of the total 108. If anyone wants to help me with inputting the data, I've created a simple tutorial at the top of the list's sandbox. Ryan4314 (talk) 02:12, 1 February 2009 (UTC)

Personal tools

Visit joltnews for the latest headlines
Visit bloit.com for company information
Geed Media does computer consulting on long island.
This page viewed times. See Logs