Template talk:Chinese space program

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject China     (Rated Template-Class)
	This article is part of WikiProject China, a project to improve all China-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other China-related articles, please join the project. All interested editors are welcome.
Template	This page is a Template and does not require a rating on the quality scale.
More information about this template... NA This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the importance scale.

SpaceWikipedia:WikiProject SpaceTemplate:WikiProject SpaceSpace articles	WikiProject Space / Spaceflight	(Rated Template-Class)
	Space portal v • d • e This template is within the scope of WikiProject Space, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Outer space on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  Template  This template does not require a rating on the project's quality scale. This template is supported by WikiProject Spaceflight (marked as NA-importance).

Human spaceflightWikipedia:WikiProject Human spaceflightTemplate:WikiProject Human spaceflightHuman spaceflight articles	WikiProject Human spaceflight	(Rated Template-Class)
	Human spaceflight portal v • d • e This template is within the scope of WikiProject Human spaceflight, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Human spaceflight on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.  Template  This template does not require a rating on the quality scale.

[edit] chinese space station?

Project 921-3, in this template is a space station, at the article, it's a space plane. That's a problem. 70.55.203.112 (talk) 11:19, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

There is a space station article at Project 921-2 70.55.203.112 (talk) 11:21, 25 September 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Too much information!

The template is too large. We need to split it into multiple templates. --Titan602 (talk) 10:16, 27 September 2008 (UTC)

I agree... it's much too large. 70.51.10.188 (talk) 23:38, 14 October 2008 (UTC)