User talk:Chunky Rice
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries. |
Archive 1 - March 6, 2007 - October 15, 2007
Archive 2 - October 17, 2007 - March 25, 2009
Contents |
[edit] Your request
has been granted.—Kww(talk) 17:25, 7 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Really?
You're an admin? And you so completely fail to understand the goals and the priorities of the project? How bizarre. Anyway, I won't war over it, so do whatever you think you have to do. But I think the right answer here is clear. Wikipedia is not a free homepage provider. Friday (talk) 17:22, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
- Given how you handle your tools, I'll wear your disdain as a badge of honor. -Chunky Rice (talk) 17:36, 18 April 2009 (UTC)
[edit] You do it
I don't want to change it, I don't feel I have the authority; earlier tonight I removed some obvious junk but I don't want to change the way the encyclopedia is written without knowing what I'm doing.--Pipelinefine (talk) 02:46, 13 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Request for your attention
May I ask you to look in at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pari Passu Realty Corp. (not specifically !vote... just poke about). As you are the one whom deleted City Connections Realty and the 2 seem connected somehow. I have the uneasy feeling that User:Gioindo is possibly a RL competitor of Pari Passu, and his edit history makes me very suspicious. Exit2DOS2000•T•C• 12:59, 14 May 2009 (UTC)
[edit] Child cannibalism/Blood libel
You redirected Child cannibalism to Blood libel without explaining why. The edit has since been reverted by 194.127.8.19 (talk). I understand the similarity, but the two articles appear to be dealing with different subject matter: Child cannibalism = eating a child or fetus, blood libel = false allegations that a group has done so. just a little insignificant 13:43, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Then the problem is with the article, not with the subject itself. I suggest moving the historical info to Blood libel and leaving Child cannibalism as a pure explanation and link to Blood libel. just a little insignificant 21:27, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
- Allow me to explain. Here are the facts as I understand it:
- Child cannibalism is the concept of eating babies or fetuses. It is an action, it is a practice, it is an idea. To date it has never been confirmed.
- Blood libel is the concept of falsely accusing a person or group of child cannibalism. It is another, separate idea. To meet the requirements one must be accusing a party of child cannibalism, and it must be a false accusation.
If you open up an AfD we can discuss this with the opinions of other editors. I look forward to participating in it. just a little insignificant 21:41, 26 May 2009 (UTC)
